Whether wealthy nations should take responsibility for helping
---no comma here--- by means of providing infrastructures, or remain bystanders
of the global poverty, is an issue of controversy.
In terms of ethics, it is inhumane to watch one's fellow man
---two words--- struggle against famine and poverty without doing anything to help, especially when it would take no effort for
the onlooker to do so
For developed nations, previously unknown
may very well arise from the work in underdeveloped nations; thus related research is conducted accordingly to conquer the problem, promoting the development of the pharmaceutical industry.---What a good point, I would never have thought of that!
The potential market in those poor countries, most of which have
a huge population, is also worth mentioning
The underdeveloped nations, in return, may export local agricultural products, mineral products with discounts for
the former, boosting each others
In summary, wealthy nations' offering to help those
in need is not only a moral deed, but also a worthwhile one which will one day pay off in other ways.
Only those who sympathize with their ---two words--- can prosper in the long run.
I agree with you, and we should always help because we are all one big family! Good luck in school and have fun!