To prince303:
I have seen the word "Rat race" in your composition. How do you really define one? And why do you negatively state that nobody escapes the race? Are there no exceptions at all?
Big cities are home to prestigious companies, they offer lucrative packages to their employees and make their dreams come true, which is impossible in small towns.
Judging from how your pronouns are placed, I anticipate that you have not proofread your composition. How many "them"s and "their"s are there? And how many plural identified subjects are there? It is easy to misunderstand and hard for readers to distinguish between subjects. Remember, overlapping subjects and ideas are quite to be penalized in literary English.
This essay is acceptable as for how grammatically correct it is. Yet to say, your theoretical argument is unsatisfying. Harmonious facilities are, of course, to be esteemed. However, they should also be blamed for making children lazier, decreasing their energy: cinema's hours of movie watching do slower the brain process (this has been proven by scientists).
I do not think that 2 paragraphs in the body can make the difference. Nonetheless, your two paragraphs have not expressed a good nor remarkable observance.
To milan2003_07:
One of the reasons why people prefer to live in cities is/are more job opportunities.
Your "is/are" is unjust. While the word "reasons" appears to be plural, it is noticeable that the author has placed "One of" in preceding position. Therefore, it is unfathomable to use "are" here. Consequently saying, "is" is a perfect choice.