Death penalty appears in many countries from advanced nations to developing ones. Some people believe that this policy has positive impacts on social security while others claim that the violation of the human right is a downside of applying punishment. I totally agree with the latter for following reasons:
Firstly, it is believed that this policy is conducive to social security. The fact is that those people who take lives of others deserve the highest punishment and victim's families feel fair. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that no sooner have judge carried out this penalty, they realize that the executed turn out be innocent. Another point is that by dint of this punishment is the human right violated. The truth is that everybody, despite making serious mistakes, should be given the chance to live and correct their mistakes as there goes a saying "to err is human".
Secondly, it is commonly seen that people's awareness and warnings increase is other benefit of death penalty. The natural rule is believed that by no means do government applies this policy, the crime rate decrease. In contrast, it is believed that owing to applying this punishment, the government is doing the similar crime. Another point is that after executing this penalty, parents of criminals suffer mentally painful while hardly do the people who give decision might feel serenity in their soul. Put it simply, the activity of killing people is conducive to extremely pain in human's soul.
In a nut shell, I strongly believe that we should abolish this punishment for humanitarian and human right.
Please correct this essay for me.
