John6503-
1) You don't think gay people are influenced genetically.
2) You don't think they should have children because they made a choice to be gay, sacrificing the right to have children.
1) Sexual Antagonism
A genetic theory of homosexuality.
By William Saletan
Posted Wednesday, June 25, 2008
First, it implies natural limits to homosexuality. You don't need to worry that gay teachers or television characters will "convert" hordes of boys. Sexually antagonistic selection is self-limiting and impervious to postnatal cultural factors. The authors' computations show no scenario in which male homosexuality spreads throughout a population.
^Based on a study far more recent than 2001. Published in 2008.
2)
showing that homosexuality is cultural and environmental rather than genetic
You post a comment which claims that homosexuality is cultural and environmental.
I know those gay people chose their own destiny to become homosexual
Which completely contradicts this statement.
Since environment and culture are both determined at birth gay people don't really have a conscious choice. So therefore why should they be subjected to the kind of inhumane discrimination you show. They can have children. I like the point simone made above about discrimination.
Also, instead of prohibiting gays from adopting, how about prohibiting the discriminaation of the children of gays?
Would children want to be left as orphans or as the sons and daughters of loving parents?