ou should not talk about the technical presentations
hi, Pahan. while I mention the technical content, like diagonally area and darkly area, it makes reader easier to identified which part of map I described, isn't it ?
During the period of 1883 to 1992 there had been a significant development taken place around the railway station making the village about three times larger than what it was.
after I read your example, I need to think more which part you mentioned, and I also seek repetitively the additional information in the bottom of the map.
All I wanna ask that which part we should attend more to describe in our writing, the content or the latent analysis of the map?
* I hope my question is quite understandable for you.