I love the beginning--very creative.
I will be nit picky here because Penn is just about the hardest American university to get into. I can tell that you put time and thought into this essay and I feel you deserve thought in return.
I'd like to echo some of the advice that you have already gotten here ... like Stephen and Simrath say, your vocab is just about getting away from you. You are at risk of losing the reader because there aren't enough rest periods, enough breaks from the SAT prep words. There isn't much sense in saying, "He had evil plans," when "He had evil machinations," works so much better. But if you start saying things like, "He sustained nefarious machinations," it tires the reader out.
Part of the problem is that all of your sentences are complex. Complex sentences are a good thing and you have used the semicolon and em-dash correctly, but there is no variety. What about adding some dialogue? Some short, punchy sentences? As is, the sentences maintain the same cadence and that lulls the reader to sleep.
You use a lot of adverbs. I just read Stephen King's
On Writing. The man makes a strong case against adverbs. When Stephen (Stephen, the moderator, not Mr. King) said that some of the vocabulary came across as being from a bad penny novel, I wonder if it was the adverbs that rankled his nerves. Stephen King is of the opinion that adverbs are for lazy writers. The use of strong verbs just about eliminates the need for adverbs at all. While we are on the subject of verbs ... there are a lot of auxiliary verbs in your piece. You can't eliminate them completely, but you can use more active verbs to strengthen your writing.
Enough of the general comments on style ... here are a few particulars I wanted to point out:
GB9:
My vision took the motion of the pendulum, kaleidoscopically the aqua-marine aura of the ocean and a land mass - disconcertingly of a similar hue - flittered in and out of view.
The pendulum as in a particular pendulum? I think this would read better if you were to substitute the indefinite article.
A pendulum. (I told you I would be nit picky). Two adverbs in the same sentence? Ack! Cut one. I'd vote
kaleidoscopically out personally. Sure, it has seven syllables and could serve as the middle line of a haiku all on its own, but it has a bit of a hippy feel and seems to contradict the "similar hues" later in the sentence. Does an
aura really have a color? I believe you are saying that the land mass is flittering in and out of view, but the sentence structure points to the aura flittering. Man, I didn't mean to be *so* picky, but I am also not crazy about the word
flittering.
Flitting is much more common (not to mention recognized by my spellchecker). While
flittering is not used incorrectly, you run the risk of the reader thinking that you meant
flitting and just used the wrong word. AND (I won't tear everything apart after this sentence) ... this is a comma splice. If I am reading it right. My vision took the motion of a pendulum ... the aura flitted in and out of view. Each of those could stand on its own as a sentence; a mere comma isn't enough to splice them together.
GB9:
Such a project had necessitated that our camaraderie of the night before evolve into a partnership, and quite startlingly into equality.
Here's a place where you could simplify. Such a project necessitated that our camaraderie from the night before evolve into an equal partnership.
GB9:
Despite my relative inexperience and this being my first international pursuit, we were both entering a realm that neither of us had tamed.
Pursuit doesn't quite fit. Is there another word that would work? Mission? Assignment? Operation?
Tamed isn't working for me either. Expected? Anticipated? Were prepared for?
GB9:
We were told that the nebulous expanse that stretched before us had been civilised no less than 24 hours ago; indeed, it seemed that what lay below us now was reminiscent more of an Atlantis than an Atlanta, and perhaps more solemnly that this was reality, no classical antiquity.
Omit
We were told. It is in passive voice and doesn't add anything to your narrative. Instead of
that stretched, you could say,
stretching--again, it eliminates some of the passive voice. Is there a reason you used
an in front of
Atlantis and
Atlanta? It makes it sound like there is more than one Atlantis and more than one Atlanta. I am not sure what you are going for here. Are you talking about a literal Atlanta or are you using it as a metaphor?
GB9:
I thought of my wife and my two young children who were, too, away from home, but enjoying the ideality of their vacation rather than confronting reality.
Personally, I don't like the adjective
ideality[/i,] and I'd omit it. On the other hand, I feel like you need an adjective in front of the word [i]reality. Something like: I thought of my wife and two children who were, too, away from home, but enjoying their vacation rather than confronting this grim reality. I am still not crazy about the sentence structure. The
two and
too so close together trip up my mind a little. Maybe: I thought of my wife and children who were away from home as well, but enjoying their vacation rather than confronting this grim reality.
GB9:
Well I thought, and irrationally hoped they weren't:
Was your hope irrational? The
Well I thought doesn't really add anything. Restructure this part of the sentence so it flows better and conveys your meaning.
I am going to have to stop here. (You are probably relieved to hear that). Man, it is late here. There is no school tomorrow, but this boy still needs his sleep. I hope that you aren't feeling shredded by my comments.
Wishing you the best!
Eric Noto