EssayForum.com
Free Academic Writing and Research Help
Faq / Register

All Threads / Unanswered      Welcome: Guest 38.107.191.115

» Username:   » Password:    [Forgot password?]

Only registered members may post here. Please login or REGISTER first.

Essay Forum / Undergraduate Admission Essays /

UC Personal Statement – Any constructive criticism or advice Available?


  Jun 10, 09, 05:31am  #
Any constructive criticism or advice that could help me revise this essay for the better will be tremendously appreciated. I'm transferring in Fall '10, and I'm hoping to get into UC Berkeley or UCLA, but UCSD is my safety. Thanks in advance.

Prompt #1 - What is your intended major? Discuss how your interest in the subject developed and describe any experience you have had in the field — such as volunteer work, internships and employment, participation in student organizations and activities — and what you have gained from your involvement.

My intended major is political science. The main reason I've chosen this major is that, throughout my life and intellectual development, the political aspects of subjects and a political understanding of human behavior have been the fundamental factors unifying most of my interests and studies, and have proven to be inextricable from my intellectual being. Indeed, insofar as political science, defined as the study of who gets what, when and how or of the workings of power and decision making, can be understood as a perspective with which one views reality and a set of methods with which one analyzes reality, politics and political science are some of the primary ways I connect with and comprehend the world.

Even when politics isn't the subject at hand, the political perspective always prevails, whether it's in analyzing the Dada art movement as a radical reaction against the bourgeois capitalist order of WWI era Europe, or examining the history of the political activity of Ancient Rome in the transition from republic to empire. Regardless, specifically political matters are the centerpiece of my intellectual activity, with a large portion of my time spent studying public policy, political philosophy and theory, and political history. Nearly all of my relevant experience in the field is comprised of research, of reading and thinking. I attempt to draw from as broad a selection of sources as possible, including everything from academic journals such Foreign Affairs, to books on political philosophy such as those by John Stuart Mill, to articles in the New York Times.

I believe that political science is the area in which I will be the most successful.

Prompt #2 - Tell us about a personal quality, talent, accomplishment, contribution or experience that is important to you. What about this quality or accomplishment makes you proud and how does it relate to the person you are?

That which is most essential to my personality and that which I am most proud of is my ability to assert myself, and the experiences that lead to the development of that ability. Those experiences began in the period leading up to and during High School, which was for me as it is for many others, a place in which various influences and factors violated the wholeness of myself, resulting, through both my own choice and through the coercion of circumstance, in my assuming a persona (i.e. thoughts, actions, interests, etc) that was largely disingenuous. Perhaps most fundamental was that, while I was deeply intellectually curious as a child, my desire to fit in with teenage culture led me to accept its vacuity as a standard that needed to be lived up to. While my attempts to reengineer myself remained unsuccessful in any fundamental sense, those early teenage years saw me severed from those people who mattered to me most, my life abandoned to chaos and disarray, my academic performance falling to the point of failure, in short, everything I loved had been exchanged for everything I hated.

By the time I neared the end of the ninth grade I had resolved to keep myself from losing control entirely, and so I decided to leave public school in exchange for Coast Redwood, a charter school which operates as a home school with a slight degree of guidance. Where I was once immersed to the point of suffocation in the miasma of peer pressure and the oppression inherent in the public school system, I was now free. Indeed, in a way I was frighteningly alone; all the affections and mannerisms I had built up around myself to maintain appearances, all the mental processes that I had attempted to force into the form of a normal student, all of the shallow cluttering of superficial friendships that I had held around myself, all that I had learned to rest my self esteem and self worth on were now irrelevant. I was, almost at once, liberated from my most drastic failures and my most integral means of self-justification. I was left with the mere kernel of my truest self.

I discovered, in the aloneness inherent in my charter school, the means for self-determination needed to reconstruct myself. Coast Redwood allowed me to choose my own coursework, learning methods, and to operate with a large deal of autonomy. Unencumbered by the impositions on my interests that were a necessary part of public school, old intellectual curiosities, dormant since childhood, reemerged, and my academic performance improved greatly. I read voraciously, consuming copious amounts of knowledge and immersing myself in everything from Greek philosophy to classical music to politics. I renewed myself intellectually during my time in Coast Redwood, committing myself to academic success, and simultaneously returning to a purer state and moving further toward a more perfect realization of myself.

Coast Redwood was, while a boon for my personal development, academically limiting. The possible success that I might have achieved there was restrained by the fact that it was still a high school. Eventually, it became clear that my best recourse would be my local community college, Cabrillo College, which I began to attend full time at 16 (while remaining nominally a Coast Redwood student). During my time spent at Cabrillo my intellectual interests broadened and flourished in a much more structured fashion than they had at Coast Redwood, and I excelled academically to a larger degree than I had ever done before or than I had ever thought possible. I eventually completed about three quarters of my transfer requirement with a near perfect GPA before I was 18.

I was struck by the deeper continuity of my personality that had been present throughout my personal development. For instance, certain traits, such as a strong desire for knowledge and understanding, or a love of learning, seemed inextricable from my character. The forces that affected this constant self, such as peer pressure or conformity, are basically an inevitable part of life and the eventual purgation of their effects during my sojourn in Coast Redwood was necessary insofar as it allowed me to develop my defenses against those forces. On a fundamental level, it was at Cabrillo where I, by my own volition, moved closer toward a more perfect realization of my potential and where I further developed the ability to assert myself.

Evan Estrella
 
EF_Simone [Moderator]
  Jun 10, 09, 08:15am  #
This is much more insightful and intellectual than the usual undergraduate admission essay; I think you have a very good shot. Watch out for wordiness, though. Revise the first sentence of the second piece so that it is not so hard to figure out what you are saying.

Examples of wordiness:

Perhaps most fundamental was that Worse, while I was deeply intellectually curious as a child, my desire to fit in with teenage culture led me to accept its vacuity as a standard that needed to be lived up to.


While my attempts to reengineer myself remained unsuccessful in any fundamental sense, those early teenage years saw me severed from those people who mattered to me most, my life abandoned to chaos and disarray, my academic performance falling to the point of failure, in short, everything I loved had been exchanged for everything I hated.

I'm not going to rewrite that one for you. But notice: Your use of passive voice throughout the sentence makes it unnecessarily long and ornate.

Simone, EssayForum.com
 
EF_Sean [Moderator]
  Jun 11, 09, 02:04am  #
"That which is most essential to my personality and that which I am most proud of is my ability to assert myself, and the experiences that lead to the development of that ability."

Wow. I've never heard anyone take that long to say "I'm assertive, and proud of it." Your writing is generally strong, with a solid use of advanced vocabulary and a fairly flowing style. Don't ruin it by trying to make simple thoughts seem more complicated than they are.

Also, if you find yourself using too many "was"es too close together, that's normally a sign you can combine sentences:

I was, almost at once, Liberated from my most drastic failures and my most integral means of self-justification, I was left with the mere kernel of my truest self"

Sean, EssayForum.com
 
Mustafa1991 [Contributor]
  Jun 11, 09, 10:18am  #
I'll do your first prompt for the first 10 errors I see.

First sentence is passable, only if you hit the gas pedal after it, which you don't.

The result is that I'm disinclined to read your essay with fervor.

But I persisted...

- "The main reason...": this reeks of what I like to call, "talking about what you are *going* to talk about"
- The comma after "that" in your second sentence is needless.
- "The political aspects of subjects"; this is really vague.
- "political understanding": what is a political understanding? assume I don't know what it is; I don't really know, actually.
- Add a comma after "when and how"
- "workings of power and decision making" is vague.
- "a perspective with which one views reality" -- "set of methods with which one analyzes reality" ... could you be any more opaque and generic?
- "politics and political science" ... do you realize that it's one or the other, or you've relinquished all credibility that remained, heretofore?
-"even when politics isn't the subject at hand... examining the history of the political activity of Ancient Rome in the transition from republic to empire" You can't say that politics isn't the subject at hand and refer to an issue that deals explicitly in politics.
- "Regardless, specifically political matters are the centerpiece of my intellectual activity, with a large portion of my time spent studying public policy, political philosophy and theory, and political history." Why did you feel the need to say "regardless?" Supposedly politics are encompassing and guide the way you perceive all order of things, but then you say "regardless." Needless to say, if I had to guess at the prompt without seeing it, I'd venture it asked you to write as vaguely possible.

That's a wrap.

On the upside, you have a decent flow, as Sean noted.

It's clear that you speak English as a native language (or well enough), and that should count for something.

The area you could improve most in, is being consistent, specific, and mindful that what you're saying makes sense.

Mustafa
 
EF_Simone [Moderator]
  Jun 11, 09, 10:37am  #
Mustafa,

Have you read George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language"? (The text is widely available online.) I think you would enjoy it.

Simone, EssayForum.com
 
Notoman [Contributor]
  Jun 11, 09, 11:33am  #
Mustafa,

I enjoy your style of critique. Some may find it harsh, especially if they are seeking validation rather than improvement, but I find it very helpful. I learned quite a bit from just those first ten errors that you picked up on. I hope to have your input the next time I have an essay to post.

Eric Noto
 
Edited by: somethingnew  Jun 11, 09, 10:14pm  #
Thanks for your responses.

Wordiness is definitely the main problem of the essay and I've been editing it since I posted it. Just keep in mind that I wrote this in one day as a rough draft. As for prompt 1, I used most of my allotted word count on prompt 2 (obviously), so I was forced to be vague with prompt 1. A big reason for this is that there really aren't any interesting, specific reasons why I want to study political science. As I said in the essay, my main contact with the subject has been reading about it, which doesn't exactly make for an interesting story. Another big problem with prompt 1 is that I'm not clear about whether I'm talking about political science specifically or politics generally.

Mustafa,
"It's clear that you speak English as a native language (or well enough), and that should count for something." The thread title says "constructive criticism". This is just an insult. While I'm thankful for your interesting critique there's no need for you to be a jerk.

"The main reason...": this reeks of what I like to call, "talking about what you are *going* to talk about" - There are many reasons why I'm applying as a political science major. This essay addresses the main one.

"political understanding": what is a political understanding? assume I don't know what it is; I don't really know, actually – political understanding = understanding using politics. See the next sentence in the essay.

"workings of power and decision making" is vague. - That sentence actually contains the textbook definition of what political science studies, so I assumed I could get away with it.

"a perspective with which one views reality" -- "set of methods with which one analyzes reality" ... could you be any more opaque and generic? - I think it's fair to say that certain disciplines led themselves to certain generic perspectives and I think PS matches mine.

"politics and political science" ... do you realize that it's one or the other, or you've relinquished all credibility that remained, heretofore? Actually, there are shades of meaning here that I think are relevant. Regardless, I'll delete the first word, "heretofore". I'm trying hard not to be petty about your grammar because I know that it's not what's at issue.

"even when politics isn't the subject at hand... examining the history of the political activity of Ancient Rome in the transition from republic to empire" You can't say that politics isn't the subject at hand and refer to an issue that deals explicitly in politics. – You're basically right. However, the way that the issue would be treated by a political scientist is different from the way that the issue would be treated by an historian.

"Regardless, specifically political matters are the centerpiece of my intellectual activity, with a large portion of my time spent studying public policy, political philosophy and theory, and political history." Why did you feel the need to say "regardless?" Supposedly politics are encompassing and guide the way you perceive all order of things, but then you say "regardless." - Yep, regardless has got to go. I was trying to show that, while I'm not monomaniacal, I do focus mainly on politics. "Regardless" of the subject matter, not the broader point.

Thanks again.

Evan Estrella
 
EF_Simone [Moderator]
  Jun 11, 09, 10:45pm  #
Mustafa's critiques were somewhat aggressively phrased but were right on target. Don't let your pique at his tone keep you from seeing the validity of his main point: That essay is empty of any real content, perhaps because -- as you say -- you don't have a strong reason for wanting to study political science. If I were you, I'd spend some time thinking carefully about the question, why do you want to study political science? What excites you about that field? What might you do with a degree in it? Then try that first prompt again.

Simone, EssayForum.com
 
  Jun 11, 09, 11:11pm  #
I actually want to be an academic (a very boring career) so I don't really have anything more compelling than "political science is the best for me". It's not that the essay doesn't have content; it's that the content isn't very interesting. Still, I should include a specific indication of my goals for the future. Also, while I was irked by Mustafa's tone, don't attribute everything I said to that because I genuinely don't think everything Mustafa said was correct.

I know all of you are well intention, so thank you for responding.

Evan Estrella
 
Notoman [Contributor]
  Jun 12, 09, 01:18am  #
Your second essay is by far the strongest. The word choice conveys intelligence. It is the tone that concerns me. When I was reading the second essay, I felt an oppression. There are a lot of negative words and the focus seems to be on not fitting in and failure rather than successes. If I were an admissions officer, I would be worried that you would be unhappy at my school and that you wouldn't be a good team player. Instead of so much about where you have been in your life, I would also want to know where you are going. Let me give you a few examples from your essay and how I perceived them:

somethingnew:
Those experiences began in the period leading up to and during High School, which was for me as it is for many others, a place in which various influences and factors violated the wholeness of myself, resulting, through both my own choice and through the coercion of circumstance, in my assuming a persona (i.e. thoughts, actions, interests, etc) that was largely disingenuous.

I see what you are saying here. The word "violated" is a strong word though. For me it evokes molestation and abuse, especially when coupled with "coercion" in the same sentence. The sentence is a bit wordy and difficult for the reader to wade through—eight commas, a set of parenthesis, and three periods (four if you were to add the missing on on etc.)—is asking a lot of the reader. The words "high school" should be lowercase (unless used with part of the name of the school—Beverly Hills High School).

somethingnew:
While my attempts to reengineer myself remained unsuccessful in any fundamental sense, those early teenage years saw me severed from those people who mattered to me most, my life abandoned to chaos and disarray, my academic performance falling to the point of failure, in short, everything I loved had been exchanged for everything I hated.

This sentence is long and I can feel its heft: unsuccessful, severed, abandoned, chaos, disarray, failure, hate. So many negative words in one place. You don't really say who it was that mattered most to you. People who were your friends prior to the reengineering? Your family? This sentence leaves me, as a reader, with the feeling that you are an unhappy person. As an admissions officer, I'd be afraid that you would bring a cloud of gloom with you to campus.

somethingnew:
the affections and mannerisms

I believe you mean affectations.

somethingnew:
Indeed, in a way I was frighteningly alone; all the affections and mannerisms I had built up around myself to maintain appearances, all the mental processes that I had attempted to force into the form of a normal student, all of the shallow cluttering of superficial friendships that I had held around myself, all that I had learned to rest my self esteem and self worth on were now irrelevant. I was, almost at once, liberated from my most drastic failures and my most integral means of self-justification. I was left with the mere kernel of my truest self.

When applying to a school, I would think it would be risky to announce that you left one educational institution because of the "oppression inherent in the public schools." Even after moving on, you are lost, unhappy, and "frighteningly alone." So . . . you start coursework at a community college, but you aren't happy there either and are now seeking to transfer. The school might be worried that you would find them oppressive as well and that you would drop out before ever acquiring a degree. Not the best indication of your ability to succeed at a new campus.

somethingnew:
The forces that affected this constant self, such as peer pressure or conformity, are basically an inevitable part of life and the eventual purgation of their effects during my sojourn in Coast Redwood was necessary insofar as it allowed me to develop my defenses against those forces.

This sentence isn't flowing for me. The word "basically" sounds childlike while "purgation" and "sojourn" look like words plucked from a thesaurus instead of words that are at home in the sentence. "Insofar" is just one of those words that takes up space (my opinion only, I just don't like that word). It isn't a word ever heard in conversation (at least in my limited suburban existence) and comes across as stuffy.

somethingnew:
I further developed the ability to assert myself.

Oh yeah. I almost forgot. You were most proud of your ability to assert yourself. It is in your introduction, your conclusion (barely), but you don't touch on assertiveness in the body.

I am a little intimidated to post this. You may very well disagree with everything I said and I may have wasted quite a bit of time. Then again, you have posted to an essay forum asking for constructive criticism. If I had more time or if you were a vulnerable child needing the praise/criticism/praise sandwich, my criticism could have been more gentle, but I don't have infinite time and you are not a child.

Wishing you the best.

Eric Noto
 
  Jun 12, 09, 02:04am  #
"I am a little intimidated to post this." I regret having created an atmosphere where you feel like that. Thanks for choosing to post here anyways. Posting here has actually been very helpful and I don't want to come off as unappreciative.

I agree with your notes on grammar and word choice. I agree that I should focus more on the future and on the positive side of the life changes I mentioned in the essay. I think that I can make it seem more optimistic if I play up the "self assertion" bit throughout the essay instead of just using it as bookends. Unfortunately, the negative tone of the essay is pretty accurate (I was exaggerating with words like "violated" though) to how I feel about my experiences and the personality issues mentioned (depression, not being a team player, etc) might hurt my chances in college. I guess I just have some more reflection to do.

Thanks a lot, you've all been helpful

Evan Estrella
 
EF_Sean [Moderator]
  Jun 12, 09, 03:50am  #
Hmmmm . . . try not to be too discouraged by some of the criticism you have be given here. Notice our first reactions:

EF_Simone:
This is much more insightful and intellectual than the usual undergraduate admission essay;


EF_Sean:
Your writing is generally strong, with a solid use of advanced vocabulary and a fairly flowing style.


That is, your essays are quite strong. They suffer from a bit of wordiness, and tend, especially in the first one, to be a bit vaguer than one might like, but still, all in all, you need to make minor corrections rather than engaging in major rewrites. Mustafa's comments can be a bit abrasive at times, but if you ignore his unjustified tone of sweeping condemnation, and focus on what he actually criticized, he's just pointing out a handful of phrases you could tighten up. Notoman's comments provide an interesting perspective on your second essay. The problem of seeming to go off-topic could probably be avoided by replacing "assertiveness" with "independence," which fits better with the anecdote you are describing. As for the essay being too negative, I wouldn't worry too much about it. The essay follows a clear arc, in which you start off being pulled down by negative forces, hit a nadir, then build yourself back up into a better person. That's sort of a traditional approach to take in this sort of essay, and you have managed to do it rather better than many others, which you should find encouraging.

Sean, EssayForum.com
 
Mustafa1991 [Contributor]
  Jun 12, 09, 04:05am  #
Woah, I didn't mean the part about you being a native English speaker as a snipe.

Of course, I didn't think at the time that someone who's only known English all their life, might take it completely differently than for what its intended purpose was.

This site is fairly diverse. I'm a first generation American myself. There are lots of people on here for whom English is a second language.

In that context, I was saying that you're capable of writing well in idiomatic English, and you have a style and current to your writing.

That's more than can be said for most people your age.

Mustafa
 
  Jun 12, 09, 04:25am  #
I guess it was just a misunderstanding. Sorry I overreacted. No hard feelings.

Just out of curiosity, what country did your family come from (I'm wondering if it's in the Muslim world owing to your name.)

Evan Estrella
 
EF_Simone [Moderator]
  Jun 12, 09, 04:46am  #
somethingnew:
I actually want to be an academic (a very boring career) so I don't really have anything more compelling than "political science is the best for me".


As an academic, I can ensure you that it's not such a boring career. For sure, you should be able to say what about political science excites you. Do the political science books you've read help you understand the world or your experiences in it? If you were to become a scholar in the field, what might you study? (Don't worry, you're not bound by what you say, but saying something specific will move that essay out of vacuity while also demonstrating knowledge and interest.) Can you, perhaps, cite a scholar or book you've particularly appreciated?

I actually liked the bit about inherently oppressive public schools -- That's political thinking! Do your interests in the field run along those lines? If so, say so!

Simone, EssayForum.com
 

Essay Forum / Undergraduate Admission Essays /
Similar Threads / All Threads / Unanswered / Random / Search     Go UPtop of page

Previous thread Next thread
i have a question about the *Choose and issue of importance essay* UCF Essay:Why did you choose to apply to UCF? ("Christmas 1997")

This thread has been closed.
 
All times are CST [GMT -6]

__________________________________

Home - Search - About Us - Faq - EF Contributors - Contact Us

Copyright (C) 2006-2009 EssayForum.com  Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, TOS  EssayForum RSS