Good afternoon.
The great thing about interpreting poetry is that there is not "right" or "wrong" answer; as long as you support your opinions, you are entitled to them. He could be talking about an old friend, who else is possible? What about the citizens of Blenheim? Your interpretation of dung is correct, therefore the bodies of the dead are decomposed. I am unfamiliar with the town of Blenheim; is it a rural community? Is it a small town? Is it a real place?
As far as the last question, you have already stated that the houses are empty; nothing grows there except wild grass. Therefore, these homes are shells of what they once were; places where life was contained and encouraged, but not anymore. Does this make their constructs more fragile? There is no one there to care for them anymore, and they are left to depend upon their own organic strengths alone to survive as long as they can. What are the ramifications of windows without panes of glass? These homes are shells of their former selves, you have already conceded that; would panes of glass make a difference in their defenses? Would they offer any kind of protection against intruders or the elements? How are the people the war left behind like these empty, helpless, standing shells; are their lives vacant, where no happiness can grow? Try to connect the two.
What are your thoughts on 7,8, and 9? Your immediate, without-too-much-thought, reflexive impressions? Remember, as long as you support your reasoning and tell me why, there is no right or wrong answer.
Regards,
Gloria
Moderator, EssayForum.com
Gloria, EssayForum.com