Hi :) Your paper has some strengths and some weaknesses. You have done a great job explaining the topic, subject matter, and quotations by Decartes. You have provided so much information and facts to back up the argument. However, at some points, the paper sounds wordy and a little like rambling, so it needs a little work. Here are a few suggestions:
I disagree with certain ideas and issues that Rene Descartes argues about in his passage. His beliefs of skepticism
at points were valid at times, but every human has a right to believe, do anything, or create what they want to believe in their mind imagination. To make it feel Reality is up to the person, because we control our emotions, which control our mind set to think if we are being trick to having ten fingers or to believe there is no god that created this world we call earth.
I began editing this sentence, but I realized that it doesn't really make sense, consider re-wording this. It sounds like rambling.
Skepticism makes a person question ideas toward
multiple a variety of things, such as knowledge or opinions that are stated as if it is true like they are true facts.
The knowledge that I have given to this argument was that you can detect yourself when you feel you are doubting your knowledge in your mind because our bodies are connect to our minds which means our senses knows what is happening, what you are thinking and the questions you are making up that is seconding guessing yourself.
Too long of a sentence, simplify.
This conveys that our knowledge is only
judge determined by our self mind, which proves to the body that we are sitting down by a fire, or that we are texting our friends. when we are bored.
His argument can be
argued validated, because people have senses that can guide them to doubt themselves, according to by the way people talk to them or other people actions. interact with them.