And pertaining my second point, i am not entirely convinced when i first wrote that. Do you have any other points that i may consider elaborating on it?
Hey, I hope you know I was just joking when I said, "No, you don't!" etc.
I was just trying to challenge you a little.
Well, this is how I would do it:
However, the juries are people chosen through a careful and stringent selection process. They are picked to act the role of weighing evidences and testimony to determine if/whether facts presented are true and can be taken as a proof.
If so, I believe the juries will carefully weight We hope that juries will weigh the defendant's past criminal records and determine whether it should be considered relevant or not to the case without prejudice or bias, but human error is unavoidable.
I made a lot of changes above: weigh, bias...
:-)